Skip to main content

MAKING THAT SUBMISSION COUNT BECAUSE WHAT YOU BELIEVE COUNTS

 |  Helen Vivian  | 
So I read in The Informer that Long Term Plan (LTP) submissions are invited. Councils and government departments probably rely on most people not making a submission. To oppose something or question a priority can be in the scary, too hard basket.  It’s actually simple for anybody to have their say by making a submission opposing or supporting all or part of a proposal, such as the TCDC’s Long Term Plan or any Resource Consent application.

Sometimes a submission form is provided or groups opposing a proposal often do a template form for members to fill out.

Otherwise you can write or type up your own to be emailed or posted to the proposers (eg TCDC) by a deadline. The current deadline for TCDC is Monday, 8 April. (No one’s going to check your spelling or mark it!)

The important points to include:

1. Start with a heading giving the reference number or description of the proposal (eg Long Term Plan 2024 -Rates or Storm water).

2. Give your name and contact details.

State whether you are submitting in support or opposition to all or part of it.

3. Clearly state the basic reasons why you are opposing or supporting it and why. Ideally one paragraph for each reason. (You don’t have to cover everything – just the points you want to make).

If relevant, you should mention how you personally might be affected by what’s being proposed. It’s important to stay on topic and be as brief as you can.  One page is good but four pages maximum.

4. It’s good to at least touch on all your arguments because you can’t bring in fresh points later if for instance it goes to a hearing.

5. You should say what you would like to see done instead of what’s being proposed.  You don’t have to cover everything in great detail – just the points you’re making.

6. You’ll be asked if you want to speak in support of your submission at a hearing.

Say yes. This makes the Council realise you’re serious about what you say.

You can always pull out later and it’s actually no big deal – you can just read out your arguments.

7. Sign it, date it and send it – and get your mates to do the same if they feel the same way.  Let them know they can copy your words.

There’s no point in being upset at what Council does or doesn’t do if you don’t at least try to make them hear your point of view. Give it to them, loud and clear!


Recent Letters to the Editor

Letters to the editor

Breakdown of $5 mill spend on Cathedral Cove track

It was great to read in Scott Simpson’s column last week that the new government has allocated $5 million from the tourist levy for DOC to get the Cathedral Cove track open again by this summer. This is surely good news for local businesses that depend on tourist traffic as well as the rest of u…
Letters to the editor

Where is Stan on Trump?

I see following a few missteps and an admittedly, terrible debate performance, Stan Stewart is calling for Joe Biden to step aside as Democrat candidate in the upcoming US election (9 July issue). But Stan, why haven’t you written a column about how unfit Donald Trump is to hold office as US pre…
Letters to the editor

Your recipes don’t work

The recent opinion article, ‘Fun recipes for better coalition leadership” (July 16, p.12) would indicate the writer’s culinary expertise comes from the Bear Grylls school of cooking; not pleasant eating. He also states, “I can’t see the logic”, a common socialist failing, but do not worry sir th…
Letters to the editor

Disappointing response on transparency

Highly disappointing, the article ‘TCDC slams door on Open Government Reform’ (The Coromandel Informer 9 July, p.2) has not triggered any meaningful reaction from readers other than Mr Minogue’s ludicrous comments (Letter to the Editor, 17 July). Unfortunately, pushing for more transparency and …
Letters to the editor

My stand on voting for Status Quo on Workshops

It’s essential to understand that I will vote as a Councillor in a way that I believe represents the interest of ratepayers for the District. This may not be my personal view but the view that I believe would be how the majority of ratepayers would want me to vote on an issue. So why did I in th…
Letters to the editor

Some cheer for this day

I read the “I am Meth” poem in The Informer of 9 July, first published 14 years ago, but still very timely. The poem is so well written even though it has been abbreviated a little. In my view, the suppliers of meth don’t receive nearly enough punishment for the harm it inflicts when consumed. …
Letters to the editor

Concern about race based seats

The drive to have seats on councils and in parliament for only Māori raises questions about our democracy and the thinking behind apartheid. Firstly, the problem that having race define the source of the MPs and the councillors means  should we not have seats for Chinese, Filipinos, Europeans an…
Letters to the editor

Social Responsibility – Social Licence

Both the Department of Conservation and their Contractors should be working with both. Both DoC and their contractors have a social responsibility not only to the Environment and the Community that they pick and choose, but to the wider community as a whole. Under consultation and permissions, D…
Letters to the editor

Policy plan needs change now – not later!

The NZ Coastal Protection Plan is ‘out of sync’ with countries in the western world in their policy that does not favour the use of rock walls, groins, or flood gates. The regional authorities come up with the strategy of ‘managed retreat’ to mitigate against coastal erosion – this strategy is u…
Letters to the editor

An opportunity too good to miss

Recent articles and letters about the Lost Spring and an entrance sign to Whitianga bring up interesting ideas.  One of the things that make NZ unique on an international scene is its geological youth and consequent volcanic and geothermal activity.  Auckland sits on an active volcanic field with…